tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17621507.post114696775287502154..comments2016-04-19T11:13:46.793+01:00Jameshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14158211760758770122noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17621507.post-1147357870590360192006-05-11T15:31:00.000+01:002006-05-11T15:31:00.000+01:00I thought it was quite good personally. Some facts may not have been mistaken, but at least the guy got their names right and portrayed wrote an article which seemed quite balanced and actually was about something. <BR/><BR/>Not one that just search desperatly for a story, before branding them "boring" or "haters" or whatever the NME wants to call them inbetween albums.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17621507.post-1147357824656997932006-05-11T15:30:00.000+01:002006-05-11T15:30:00.000+01:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Ebbshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06915118983450138937noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17621507.post-1147276259951904102006-05-10T16:50:00.000+01:002006-05-10T16:50:00.000+01:00HAhaha the idea of JDB having done that is fucking hilarious thoughAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17621507.post-1147211355133036462006-05-09T22:49:00.000+01:002006-05-09T22:49:00.000+01:00What an utterly rubbish article; I lost all respect after they got the MSPs story completely wrong.<BR/><BR/>1. He's NEVER James Bradfield, he's James Dean Bradfield.<BR/>2. It WASN'T HIM, it was Richey James Edwards!Hydehttp://awc.supremepixels.comnoreply@blogger.com